A Thought from the Road Less Sampled

Last week, while riding my bike through the countryside (a good way to clear the head and wrap up loose thoughts), an old problem came back with new clarity. We talk a lot about testing data pipelines, but very little about the quality of the test data we use.

Somewhere in between the winding roads, a new idea took shape: an open-source tool we might call reverse sampling.

Here’s the setup: Testing data pipelines isn’t just about having some data. It’s about having the right data. And more often than we admit, we get this part wrong.

Modern pipelines are layered: joins on joins, filters stacked with aggregations, time-based constraints baked in. When we sample input datasets natively, the pipeline doesn’t throw an error. It just runs clean and outputs almost no realistic bugs. Which is worse, because now we’re staring at a green checkmark and assuming all is well.

What we need is a smarter way to generate test data. One that starts from the end state, a known, production-like output, and works backwards to identify the minimal, valid inputs that would produce it. That’s where the idea of reverse sampling begins.

The Real Problem with Traditional Sampling

Most data engineers don’t think twice before sampling. They grab a few thousand rows, run the pipeline, and move on. But that kind of surface-level approach breaks fast when you’re working with real pipelines. Not toy DAGs, but the kind that sprawl across multiple layers of joins, filters, and time-based logic.

Here’s a familiar scenario: you're filtering for events from the last 15 minutes, but your sample was randomly pulled from five years of historical data. The chances of anything making it through that filter are close to zero. The pipeline doesn’t crash. It just gives you... nothing.

Now you're stuck. The test runs clean, no alerts are triggered, but you're blind. You've wasted hours debugging the wrong thing or assumed the pipeline works because it’s silent. Translate this to scale: a batch of pipelines in testing. This is the quiet failure mode of traditional sampling, and it's a productivity trap most teams walk into without realising it.

Enter Reverse Sampling: A Paradigm Shift

Most sampling strategies start from the input: take a random subset, maybe apply a few filters, and hope it’s good enough. But what if we flipped the process? What if we started with the output we wanted and worked backwards to figure out what input data could have produced it?

That’s the core idea behind Reverse Sampling. Instead of pushing random inputs through the pipeline and praying for non-empty results, we begin with a known-good output: production-like data that reflects what we expect to see downstream. Then, we trace the lineage of that output through each step of the pipeline. Join by join. Filter by filter.

A Sample Use Case of Reverse Sampling

Case: Say we’re dealing with a pipeline that joins order events to product details, applies business logic, and filters for events in the last 15 minutes.

The Typical Approach

Traditional sampling might randomly select a few thousand rows from five years of order data and a few hundred from the product table. But if the sampled orders don’t happen to fall in the last 15 minutes, or the product IDs don’t overlap, the join yields nothing. Downstream logic has nothing to work with. The test passes. The data disappears.

The Visible Shift in Testing Accuracy with Reverse Sampling

Now take the same case, but with reverse sampling. We start with a few real records from the production output. Orders we know passed through the filters and joins. We extract the product IDs, timestamps, customer segments; everything that contributed to those rows.

Then, we walk backwards through the SQL or dataframes to identify the minimal viable inputs: the exact order rows, the matching product entries, the correlated data that preserves the integrity of the pipeline.

By tracing from output to input, reverse sampling ensures that the sample isn’t just

• structurally valid, but
• semantically meaningful.
• Referential integrity is preserved.
• Time windows align.
• Business logic remains intact.
• And when the pipeline runs in test, it behaves like production. Not because it’s running more data, but because it’s running the right data.

How Reverse Sampling Works

At its core, reverse sampling is about treating the pipeline as a graph, and walking it backwards: from output to source. Reverse sampling is a methodical walk backward through your pipeline to reconstruct the minimal input needed to produce a meaningful test output.

📝 Reading Recommendations
Right-to-Left Data Engineering ↗️
Model-First Data Products ↗️

Here's how it would work, step by step:

1. Start with a production-like output sample
   Take a small, trusted sample from the final output of your pipeline. These are rows that reflect real business logic: already filtered, joined, aggregated.
2. Trace the output columns back through the pipeline
   Identify how each column in the output was derived. Which joins contribute keys? Which filters were applied? Which aggregations shaped the metrics?
3. Extract the required keys, values, and conditions
   From the sample, extract critical values—join keys, timestamp ranges, flag values, and group-by categories. These become your sampling constraints.
4. Walk backwards through each transformation
   For each step (joins, filters, groupings), reverse-engineer the conditions needed upstream. For joins, make sure input datasets include the right keys. For filters, ensure values exist in the upstream data. For groupings, retain the contributing rows.
5. Subset upstream datasets based on derived constraints
   Apply targeted sampling on the original input datasets using the values extracted above. You’re no longer sampling randomly, you’re sampling intentionally.
6. Validate the reconstructed pipeline
   Run the full pipeline using your reverse-sampled inputs. The goal: a small test run that still exercises the full logic of your production flow, with minimal yet meaningful data.

This approach guarantees that every test you run has referential integrity, meaningful filter matches, and accurate aggregations, without copying the entire production dataset.

In a Data Product stack,

where each output has precise and independent transformation lineage due to right-to-left data engineering (developing pipelines backwards: model-first instead of pipeline-first), implementing reverse sampling becomes easier. Tracing output columns back through the pipeline is not a time-suicide mission, but the norm and time-effective.

Reverse Pipeline Development Sequence (Model-First) = Easier Reverse-Pipeline Testing/Data Sampling Sequence

Here’s a glimpse of reverse development for reference. For a thorough analysis, check out How Data Becomes Product.

‍

Possibilities of Reverse Sampling Implementation

This section is to explore the art of possibility; ideas and open spaces ripe for innovation.

A. Reverse Sampling Meets Mock Data as a Service

The steps above outline the logic behind reverse sampling, but you shouldn’t have to do them manually. That’s where the idea of Mock Data as a Service (MDaaS) comes in.

Instead of reverse-engineering constraints by hand, a well-designed MDaaS layer can automate the entire trace, from output to input. Given a production-like sample and your pipeline logic (SQL or dataframe-based), the service can:

• Parse transformations and build a dependency graph
• Detect filtering conditions, joins, and aggregations automatically
• Infer required keys, time windows, and flags directly from the output
• Subset source datasets with precision, generating valid, lightweight mocks that retain the behavioural integrity of production data

What you get is a test-ready dataset that flows through your pipeline and behaves exactly as it would in prod, without copying sensitive data, and without long dev cycles spent chasing missing rows.

Reverse sampling becomes not just a clever technique, but a plug-and-play capability. One that scales with every pipeline you build. One that frees data engineers from brittle, guess-based mocks and opens the door to real test confidence.

References:
Prototype valiation using mock data ↗️
Why generating data for testing is surprisingly challenging ↗️

B. Open Source Tool to Simulate Realistic Mock Data

What if this wasn’t just an internal trick or an abstract method, but a tool anyone could use?

Reverse sampling reveals a real gap in the modern data tooling landscape: there’s no standard way to simulate realistic, minimal, test-safe datasets that mirror production behaviour. So, the natural next step is building an open-source tool that makes this a default capability.

This tool would:

• Accept a sample output dataset (or downstream expectations)
• Parse the pipeline logic—SQL or dataframe operations
• Walk backwards to infer the required input constraints
• Generate minimal input mocks that guarantee referential integrity and logic coverage
• Output test-ready data in familiar formats (Parquet, CSV, Snowflake tables, etc.)

Rather than generating fake data from arbitrary schemas, it would simulate valid paths through the actual logic of your pipeline. The focus isn’t on randomness or volume, it’s on fidelity to the real data flow.

By being open source, it could plug into any orchestration stack, CI pipeline, or data platform. It could work alongside dbt, Airflow, or Spark. And over time, it could learn from patterns across pipelines, optimising how sampling constraints are inferred.

This isn’t just a tool for test data. It’s a missing layer in the modern data developer stack, one that treats pipelines as living systems and testing as a first-class citizen.

C. Embedding AI in the Stack for Simplified Mock Data Simulation

*Excerpt from AI Augmentation to Scale Data Products (Modern Data 101 Archives)

Generating mock data streams for validating data product prototypes can be a cumbersome task due to the complexity and low-level nuances of domain-specific data. But AI attempts to make it a cakewalk today.

Let’s assume you are on the operations team in the moving enterprise and want to build a data product, say, ‘Route Efficiency Optimiser.’ The image depicts the general flow of using NLP to generate synthetic data, followed by powering this flow to generate real-time mock data streams.

1. Schema Generation

A schema for a logistics dataset might include columns like Route ID, Vehicle ID, Start Location, End Location, Distance, Travel Time, Delivery Volume, Delivery Time Windows, Cost, etc.

AI can interpret this schema and generate the appropriate data types, such as:

• integers for Route ID, Vehicle ID, Delivery Volume, and Stop Count;
• floats for Distance, Travel Time, Delivery Volume, and Cost, and
• strings for Start Location, End Location, and Delivery Time Windows.

AI can then analyse this data to identify patterns, optimise routes, and improve overall route efficiency. AI can handle more complex structures, such as nested JSON objects or arrays, which are common in real-world data scenarios.

An AI engine also enables finding relationships between data assets, such as tables or other entities, that can be joined for a data product. The process of schema generation is equally aided by AI in both stages of creating mock data as well as while dealing with the real data.

2. Data Synthesis

Once the schema is defined, AI can generate synthetic data that mimics real-world data patterns. This includes:

1. Randomised Data Generation: Creating diverse data points that follow specified distributions, such as generating a range of transaction amounts for financial data.
2. Pattern Recognition: Generating data that follows specific patterns or correlations, such as time series data for monitoring systems.

3. Real-Time Mock Data Streams

Using APIs to send prompts and receive generated schemas. For example, integrating with OpenAI's API allows for seamless schema creation. OpenAI's GPT-4 or similar LLMs. AI can generate real-time mock data streams, which are essential for testing event-driven architectures and real-time analytics platforms. This is particularly useful for applications like real-time personalisation, fraud detection, and dynamic inventory management.

Why We Need an Open-Source Reverse Sampling Tool Now

As of today, a lot of data engineers just copy production data in test environments, because they do not know (or have no time/bandwidth for) how to sample input datasets properly. That leads to inefficiencies, both in processing times and costs, for the least. Potentially to security risks too. A "reverse sampling" tool, therefore, would be very beneficial to a lot of people.

This is a tool that understands how data flows through pipelines. One that doesn’t just sample blindly, but does so with context: automatically tracing the transformations, filters, joins, and time windows that shape the final output.

With Data Products in the picture that binds the context of data, metadata, and transform logic, tapping into this context for a reverse sampling platform module is even easier. (Refer: Image below).

‍

Reverse sampling gives us the methodology. An open-source tool makes it accessible. It would lower the barrier to accurate, lightweight testing. Replace tribal knowledge with repeatable patterns. And let developers move faster without sacrificing confidence.

‍

Thanks for reading Modern Data 101! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support our work.

MD101 Support ☎️

If you have any queries about the piece, feel free to connect with the author(s). Or feel free to connect with the MD101 team directly at community@moderndata101.com 🧡

Author Connect

Insights from the Experts, Leaders, & Practitioners ♨

The Modern Data Survey Report is dropping soon; join the waitlist here.